Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1951

Marie E. Barwick v. Hinda S. Manheim

Marie E. Barwick v. Hinda S. Manheim
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided June 7, 1951
189 F.2d 702; 89 U.S. App. D.C. 406; 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3221 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Marie E. Barwick v. Hinda S. Manheim

Opinion

189 F.2d 702

89 U.S.App.D.C. 406

Marie E. BARWICK, Petitioner
v.
Hinda S. MANHEIM, Respondent.

Misc. No. 285.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued May 24, 1951.
Decided June 7, 1951.

Jo V. Morgan, Jr., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

James M. Desmond, Washington, D.C., with whom Roy B. Kelly, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for respondent.

Before EDGERTON and BAZELON, Circuit Judges, and ARTHUR F. LEDERLE, District Judge sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

1

The petition for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is denied. Wells v. United States, 318 U.S. 257, 63 S.Ct. 582, 87 L.Ed. 746; Newman v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 419, 184 F.2d 275.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑