U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1951

Bethlehem Steel Company and Bethlehem Sparrows Point Shipyard, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided June 7, 1951 · Bazelon, Clark, Per Curiam, Proctor

191 F.2d 340; 89 U.S. App. D.C. 122; 28 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2141; 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3454 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Chester A. McLain, of the Bar of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New. York, pro hac vice, New York City, by special leave of Court, with whom Albert R. Connelly, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioners. E. Fontaine Broun, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for petitioners., Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Bernard Dunau, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., with whom A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision. The 3 that cite it most often are listed here.

United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, the Dow Chemical Company, Intervenor (3d Cir. 1976)
West Texas Utilities Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (D.C. Cir. 1953)
Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers v. National Labor Relations Board (3d Cir. 1963)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

• The order of the National Labor Relations Board is set aside and, as a consequence, the Board’s request for enforcement thereof is denied. National Labor Relations Board v. Highland Park Mfg. Co., 341 U.S. 322, 71 S.Ct. 758. To the extent that our decision in West Texas Utilities Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1950, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 179, 184 F.2d 233, certiorari denied 341 U.S. 939, 71 S.Ct. 999, runs counter to the decision of the Supreme Court in Highland Park, we consider it overruled. The alternative ground for decision, which existed in West Texas, is not present here.

Enforcement denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.