U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1952

Hammond v. Hammond

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided June 26, 1952 · Edgerton, Clark, Wilbur, Miller

198 F.2d 529; 91 U.S. App. D.C. 100; 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3199 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

James T, Wright, Washington, D. C., for appellant., William L. Houston, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Ramos v. Ramos (D.C. 1972)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the absence of sexual intercourse between appellant and appellee, her continuing for a few weeks to live in the same house with him after she knew of his adultery was not condonation and did not bar her divorce suit. Boyce v. Boyce, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 355, 153 F.2d 229. We have examined appellant’s other contentions but find no error.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.