U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1952

Hillyard v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. Of Hartford, Conn

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided July 31, 1952 · Edgerton, Proctor, Bazelon

198 F.2d 606; 91 U.S. App. D.C. 206; 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3217 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Joseph J. Lyman, Washington, D. C., for appellants., Cornelius H. Doherty, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision. The 6 that cite it most often are listed here.

Carlos Marcello v. Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United States (D.C. Cir. 1962)
Bernice M. Gordon v. Gladys Lloyd Matthews (D.C. Cir. 1959)
Donnelly v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency (D.C. Cir. 1959)
Raymond C. Byers v. Guinevere E. Byers (5th Cir. 1958)
Thresa Williams and Jennie L. Richards v. John Dalton, Wallace Waalkes, Jr., Dr. Roy A. Morter and Dr. Clarence E. Schrier (6th Cir. 1956)
Manchester Gardens, Inc. v. Great West Life Assur. Co. Great West Life Assur. Co. v. Manchester Gardens, Inc (D.C. Cir. 1953)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment for the defendant (appellee) in a suit upon an insurance policy for losses allegedly sustained by interruption to plaintiffs’ (appellants’) business caused from fire damage. The issues formed by the pleadings and pretrial order involved alleged noncompliance by plaintiffs with certain conditions of the insurance policy. The case was tried without a jury. The court found in favor of defendant and entered judgment accordingly.

We think there was ample evidence to support the court’s findings and that its conclusions were correct. We find no prejudicial error.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.