U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1952

Stern v. Stern Co. Of Washington, D.C.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided November 28, 1952 · Clark, Miller, Bazelon

200 F.2d 364; 91 U.S. App. D.C. 338 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Jerrold Scoutt, Jr., Washington, D. C, with whom A. L. Wheeler, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant., John H. Burnett, Washington, D. C., with whom Chapin B. Bauman', Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Celtech, Inc. v. Broumand (D.C. 1991)
Foulger-Pratt Residential Contracting, LLC v. Madrigal Condominiums, LLC (District Court, District of Columbia 2011)
Foulger-Pratt Residential Contracting, LLC v. Madrigal Condominiums, LLC (District Court, District of Columbia 2011)
Lopata v. Coyne (D.C. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant is seeking a reversal of a judgment of the District Court adopting the report of a referee appointed under Section 1701 et seq. of Title 16 of the District of Columbia Code (1951). The court below found no impropriety in the proceedings before the referee and no error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law. The award of a referee or arbitrator may be vacated or modified only on the grounds clearly specified in the statute. No showing of the existence of any of these grounds having been made, we see no reason to disturb the judgment .of the District Court.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.