U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1952

Hart v. Williams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided November 28, 1952 · Clark, Proctor, Baze-Lon

202 F.2d 190; 91 U.S. App. D.C. 340 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Barrington D. Parker and George A. Parker, Washington, D. C., submitted on the brief for appellant., John H. Wilson, Washington, D. C., submitted on the brief for appellees Percy B. Williams and Louise E. Williams., John J. Carmody and Jo V. Morgan, Jr., Washington, D. C., submitted on the brief for appellee American Building Association.

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision. The 10 that cite it most often are listed here.

Victor Decosta v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. (1st Cir. 1975)
First Iowa Hydro Electric Cooperative v. Iowa-Illinois Gas And Electric Company (1st Cir. 1957)
First Iowa Hydro Electric Cooperative v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co. (8th Cir. 1957)
DeCosta v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. (District Court, D. Rhode Island 1974)
State of Maryland for the Use of Nadine Y. Levin v. United States of America, State of Maryland for the Use of Sydney L. Johns v. United States (3d Cir. 1964)
Skokomish Indian Tribe v. Fitzsimmons (Wash. Ct. App. 1999)
Borough of Lansdale, Pennsylvania v. Federal Power Commission, Philadelphia Electric Company, Intervenor (D.C. Cir. 1974)
Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission (D.C. Cir. 1968)
B & M SERVICE, INC. v. Public Utilities Commission (Colo. 1967)
Taylor v. England (D.C. 1965)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a hearing in appellant’s suit to enforce a mechanic’s lien, the court below overruled his objections to an order of reference to the aúditor, and exceptions to the auditor’s report. Appellant appeals from this action and the entry of judgment against him.

The objections to the reference are without merit. Moreover, the reference was made pursuant to- the agreement of all counsel and the objections were not made until after the auditor had found the issues in favor of the appellees. And since the record amply supports the trial court’s action in overruling appellant’s exceptions to the report, the judgment below must be Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.