King v. Nixon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
King v. Nixon, 207 F.2d 41 (D.C. Cir. 1953)
93 U.S. App. D.C. 98
Edgerton, Fahy, Per Curiam, Washington

King v. Nixon

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The District Court rightly ruled that recovery of exemplary or punitive damages, in a civil action for assault and battery, is not precluded by the fact that the defendant may be liable to criminal prosecution, 1 and also that the defendant’s financial condition is admissible in evidence as bearing on the amount of such damages. Brown v. Evans, C.C., 17 F. 912; affirmed, Evans v. Brown, 1883, 109 U.S. 180, 3 S.Ct. 83, 27 L.Ed. 898; notes, 16 A.L.R. 771, 798, 838, 123 A.L.R. 1115, 1122, 1136.

Affirmed.

1

. Language to the contrary in Huber v. Teuber, 1879, 3 MacArthur 484, 497, 10 D.C. 484, is erroneous.

Reference

Cited By
6 cases
Status
Published