Harrow v. Britton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit November 5, 1953

Harrow v. Britton, 209 F.2d 303 (D.C. Cir. 1953)

93 U.S. App. D.C. 128; 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3834

Clark, Per Curiam, Prettyman, Washington

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case concerns a claim for compensation under the District of Columbia Workmen’s Compensation Law. 1 Our present appellant filed a claim alleging that subsequent to July 15, 1946, she had suffered disability resulting from an injury incurred March 12, 1946. After hearing, the Deputy Commissioner made a finding of fact “that subsequent to July 9, 1946 the claimant has suffered no disability attributable to the injury of March 12, 1946”. We have examined the record as a whole and find ample evidence to support that finding. That is as far as our authority permits us to go. 2

Affirmed.

. Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 44 Stat. 1424 (1927), 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq., as made applicable to the District of Columbia by Act of May 17, 1928, 45 Stat. 600, D.C. Code § 36-501 (1951), 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 note.

. O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, 1951, 340 U.S. 504, 71 S.Ct. 470, 95 L.Ed. 483.

Reference

Full Case Name: HARROW v. BRITTON Et Al.
Status: Published