U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1954

Ingram v. United States

Ingram v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided January 21, 1954 · Edgerton, Miller, Fahy
209 F.2d 818; 93 U.S. App. D.C. 307 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Foster Wood, Washington, D. C., for appellant., Mr. Samuel J. L’Hommedieu, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and Lewis A. Carroll and Arthur J. McLaughlin, Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for ap-pellee. Mr. William J. Peck, Asst. U. S. Atty. at time record was filed, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for appellee.

Ingram v. United States

Cases that cite this one

26 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant waived trial by jury on a charge of violating the lottery laws, D. C.Code 1951, §§ 22-1501, 22-1502, 52 Stat. 198-199. She was convicted. She afterwards urged, in support of a motion for a new trial, that her trial counsel “refused to permit her to testify” and failed to introduce certain other testimony. In our opinion the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, and its judgment placing the defendant on probation is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.