U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1954

Parelman v. Parelman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided February 4, 1954 · Miller, Baze-Lon, Washington

210 F.2d 29; 93 U.S. App. D.C. 361 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. J. E. Bindeman, Washington, D. C. , for appellant. Mr. Theodore Klig-man, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for appellant., Mr. Albert E. Brault, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Denver H. Graham, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Alexander v. Jennings (W. Va. 1966)
Alexander v. Jennings (W. Va. 1966)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this suit a mother charged her son with negligence which she alleged was the proximate cause of personal injuries sustained by her, for which she sought damages in the sum of $25,000. The mother complains on appeal that the trial judge erred in directing a verdict for the defendant at the close of her counsel’s opening statement to the jury.

We think the judge correctly concluded, from what the plaintiff’s counsel said he expected to prove, that a cause of action had not been stated.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.