U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1954

Winkel v. Matthews

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided June 17, 1954 · Edgerton, Fahy, Per Curiam, Washington

214 F.2d 281; 94 U.S. App. D.C. 216; 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2689 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Alvis Layne, Jr., Washington, D. C. appointed by this Court, with whom Mrs. Antonia H. Chayes, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant., Mr. Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and Lewis A. Carroll and Edward O. Fennell, Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

W.M. And A. Transit Company v. Clara Radecka (D.C. Cir. 1962)
Frank R. Jelleff, Inc. v. Blanche K. Braden (D.C. Cir. 1956)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order discharging a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant is in custody under an extradition order. He contends he was held an unreasonably long time on a mere detainer before the requisition from Ohio, the demanding State, was received. The record does not clearly establish this contention. In any event the contention does not appear to have been made in the District Court, Certainly it was not made during the time when appellant was — allegedly—unreasonably held. We find no error affect-inS substantial rights,

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.