U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1954

Karl Riemer v. Phyllis Miller Riemer

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided November 18, 1954 · Miller, Danaher

221 F.2d 519; 95 U.S. App. D.C. 242; 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3318 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Dean B. Lewis, Washington, D. C., with- ■ whom Mr. Albín L. Newmyer Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant. • Mr. David G. Bress, Washington, D. C.,. entered an appearance for appellant., Mr. James M. Earnest, Washington, D. C., wr;h whom Mr. Fred M. Vinson, Jr., Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appel.ee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole question on this appeal from a District Court judgment in favor of appellee and against her former husband is v'hether the facts of. record disclose tha; he was in default in certain payments for maintenance of their three children under the terms of their separation agreement. We think the agreement sufficiently clear to say, as a matter of law, that he was in default. The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.