U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1954

Louis H. Saper, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Westex Company, Inc. v. United Typewriter Company, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided December 23, 1954 · Bastian, Baze-Lon, Per Curiam, Prettyman, Walter

221 F.2d 831; 95 U.S. App. D.C. 277; 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3972 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Philip W. Amram, Washington, D. C., fcr appellant. Mr. Bernard L. Goodman. Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellant., Mr. Mark P. Friedlander, Washington, D. ()., with whom Messrs. Hyman Goldstein, New York City, and Norman Freedenfcerg, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

28 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

Keene v. United States (D.C. 1995)
Winfield v. United States (D.C. 1996)
Woodward & Lothrop v. Hillary (D.C. 1991)
Towles v. United States (D.C. 1985)
State v. Johnson (S.D. 1977)
William H. Fuller v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1969)
William C. Coleman v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1961)
Masters v. Commissioner (3d Cir. 1957)
Murphy v. Bonanno (D.C. 1995)
Portillo v. United States (D.C. 1992)
Collins v. United States (D.C. 1985)
Matter of CBN (D.C. 1985)
In re C.B.N. (D.C. 1985)
Lawrence v. United States (D.C. 1984)
Sherer v. United States (D.C. 1983)
Reed v. United States (D.C. 1982)
Lee v. United States (D.C. 1982)
McLean v. United States (D.C. 1977)
Miles v. United States (D.C. 1977)
United States v. Akers (D.C. 1977)
United States v. Earlie Edmonds, Jr., Also Known as Earlie Edmund, Jr. (D.C. Cir. 1975)
United States v. Leonard T. Robinson, United States of America v. James E. McCaffity United States of America v. Louis Johnson (D.C. Cir. 1973)
Edward Byron Hale v. United States (5th Cir. 1971)
Wilson v. United States (D.C. 1970)
Thomas Howard, Jr. v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1968)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order of the District Court granting defendant-ap-pellee’s ..notion to dismiss this suit for exoneration at the conclusion of plaintiff-appellant’s evidence. We agree with the Dislrict Court that such “evidence failed to establish [the necessary] relationship of principal and agent between the [parties].” The dismissal order is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.