U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1954

Shay v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided February 19, 1954

212 F.2d 809; 93 U.S. App. D.C. 379 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Messrs. Curtis P. Mitchell and De-Long Harris, Washington, D. C., for appellants., Mr. Samuel J. L’Hommedieu, Jr., Asst. U. S Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., Lewis A, Carroll, and John D. Lane, Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee. Messrs. E. Riley Casey, Asst. U. S. Atty., and William R. Glendon, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., at time record was filed entered appearances in No. 11809. Mr. William J. Peck, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., at time record was filed, entered an appearance in No. 11809 and No. 11846.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Shay v. United States. Brown v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1954)
Maynard v. United States. Mallette v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1954)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Of the several contentions raised on these appeals, the only one that would otherwise require discussion relates to the form and execution of search warrants and is answered by Ledbetter v. United States, 93 U.S.App.D.C., 211 F.2d 628. As we held in that case, D.C. Code 1951 § 23-301 need not be complied with when Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure [28 U.S. C.A.] is complied with.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.