U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1955

The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Carl N. Peigh, Buel C. Griffin and Omar A. Safly

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided February 17, 1955 · Edgerton, Miller, Prettyman

219 F.2d 764; 95 U.S. App. D.C. 83 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Stephen Ailes, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Henry C. Ikenberry, Jr., Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Laidler B. Maekall, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellant., Mr. Douglas A. Clark, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Charles H. Quim-by, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Princemont Construction Corp. v. A. D. Smith (D.C. Cir. 1970)
Thomas F. Maher v. Isthmian Steamship Company (2d Cir. 1958)
Lucille M. Rankin, Administratrix on the Estate of Ronald Rankin, Deceased v. Shayne Brothers, Inc., Billy F. Rankin v. Shayne Brothers, Inc. (D.C. Cir. 1956)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff, entered on a jury’s verdict, in a suit for personal injuries. We reversed a former judgment for the defendant. Peigh v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 92 U.S.App.D.C. 198, 204 F.2d 391. The defendant’s contentions concern negligence, contributory negligence, proximate cause, and the admission and exclusion of evidence. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge, dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.