U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1955

Thomas M. Walsh v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided March 10, 1955 · Edgerton, Prettyman, Bazelon

220 F.2d 488; 95 U.S. App. D.C. 123; 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3382 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. James T. Barbour, Jr., Washington, D. C., for appellant., Mr. George E. Hamilton III, Asst. U. S. Atty. with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and Lewis Carroll, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The question is whether a forfeited recognizance is a judgment within the meaning of D.C.Code 1951, § 15-101, 31 Stat. 1381. We agree with the District Court that it is not. Cf. D.C.Code 1951, § 15-103, 31 Stat. 1381.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.