U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1955

United States v. Owen Lattimore

United States v. Owen Lattimore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided June 14, 1955 · Edgerton, Prettyman, Miller, Bazelon, Fahy, Washington, Danaher, Bastian, Chambers
232 F.2d 334; 98 U.S. App. D.C. 77; 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3295 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. John W. Jackson, Special Asst, to the Atty. Gen., at the time record was filed, Joseph M. F. Ryan, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., and George J. Donegan, Atty., Dept. of Justice, were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Lewis Carroll, Asst. U. S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellant., Messrs. Thurman Arnold and Joseph C. O’Mahoney, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Abe Fortas, Paul A. Porter and William D. Rogers, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

United States v. Owen Lattimore

Cases that cite this one

29 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was argued by counsel.

Upon consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the United States District Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, affirmed by an equally-divided Court, and that each Judge of this Court reserves the right to file a statement 1 of his vote and his reasons.

1

. No opinions filed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.