United States v. Owen Lattimore
Cases that cite this one
29 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- United States v. Milford E. Cook (9th Cir. 1972)
- Patricia G. Brooks v. William C. De Lacy, Administrator, Estate of Walter G. Maholm, Deceased (D.C. Cir. 1958)
- State v. Douglas (Neb. 1984)
- United States v. Hilliard (District Court, S.D. New York 1977)
- United States v. Clifford (District Court, E.D. New York 1976)
- United States v. Dwight L. Chapin (D.C. Cir. 1975)
- United States v. Bronston (District Court, S.D. New York 1971)
- United States v. Loretta Wall (6th Cir. 1967)
- United States v. Louis A. Marchisio, John H. Seiter and W. Ward Whipple (2d Cir. 1965)
- In re Estate of Lucas (District Court, District of Columbia 1964)
- George J. O'Sullivan v. Arma G. Hicks (D.C. Cir. 1963)
- John Franklin Gage v. The Riggs National Bank of Washington, D. C., Administrator, Estate of Margaret Delano Gage, Deceased (D.C. Cir. 1963)
- The United States of America v. Jose Diogo, Domingo Das Canas Costa and Manuel Vilanova Gonzalez (2d Cir. 1963)
- United States v. William Hird (3d Cir. 2019)
- United States v. William Hird (3d Cir. 2018)
- United States v. Hillie (District Court, District of Columbia 2017)
- United States v. Jenkins (District Court, N.D. New York 2014)
- United States v. Long (District Court, S.D. New York 1988)
- United States v. Fred J. Lighte (2d Cir. 1986)
- State v. Douglas (Neb. 1984)
- In re Estate of Shorter (D.C. 1982)
- United States v. Bronston (District Court, S.D. New York 1971)
- John Franklin Gage v. The Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C., Administrator, Estate of Margaret Delano Gage, Etc., Deceased (D.C. Cir. 1964)
- United States v. Cobert (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 1964)
- United States v. North American Van Lines, Inc. (District Court, District of Columbia 1962)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
This case came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was argued by counsel.
Upon consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the United States District Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, affirmed by an equally-divided Court, and that each Judge of this Court reserves the right to file a statement 1 of his vote and his reasons.
. No opinions filed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.