U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1955

M. J. Uline Co. v. Schnittker

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided January 13, 1955

218 F.2d 373 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Reese Dill, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Ohio, Cleveland, Ohio, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. Charles Effinger Smoot, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee in No. 12,193 and appellant in No. 12,194., Mr. Benjamin W. Dulany, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Edmund D. Campbell, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant in No. 12,193 and appellee in No. 12,194.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

The M. J. Uline Company, Inc. v. Richard D. Schnittker, Richard D. Schnittker v. The M. J. Uline Company, Inc. (D.C. Cir. 1955)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit by a former employee against his employer for damages for breach of the employment contract. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff. The employer appeals (No. 12,193), chiefly on the ground that under its construction of the contract it was not subject to liability. The plaintiff also appeals (No. 12,194), on the ground that damages were fixed at too low an amount. After reviewing the record, we find no error affecting the rights of either party. The judgment of the District Court will accordingly be

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.