U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1955

Burke v. Thomas J. Fisher & Co.

Burke v. Thomas J. Fisher & Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided February 17, 1955
219 F.2d 767; 95 U.S. App. D.C. 85 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Burke v. Thomas J. Fisher & Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Anne Burke and River Road Development Corporation appeal from the District Court’s judgment which dismissed their complaint against Leo F. Donovan and Catherine J. Donovan for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate or, alternatively, for damages in the sum of $150,000. Thomas J. Fisher & Company, Inc., the real estate broker with which Burke and River Road had made a deposit of $5,000, appeals from the judgment, which in effect forfeited the deposit, and ordered it divided equally between the Fisher company and the Donovans.1

*768Although the Fisher company’s cross-claim against the Donovans for a commission of five per cent, amounting to $9,500, was not discussed in the trial court’s opinion2 and was not expressly dealt with in the judgment, Fisher devoted its argument on appeal to the proposition that the cross-claim was improperly dismissed. Doubtless such dismissal is implicit in the judgment, since the court concluded as a matter of law that the sellers had properly declared a forfeiture. It followed, therefore, that the Fisher company was entitled to only $2,500, or one half of the deposit forfeited when the buyer defaulted.

We see no reason to disturb the judgment of the District Court.

Affirmed.

. The judgment from which these appeals are taken is as follows:

“The Court, having heretofore entered its findings of fact and conclusions of law herein, it is by the Court this 15th day of January, 1954,
“Ordered: Adjudged, and Decreed:
“1. That the complaint filed herein by Anne Burke and the River Road Development Corporation, a corporation, be dismissed.
“2. That the defendants, Leo F. and Catherine J. Donovan, have judgment against the cross-defendant, Thomas J. *768Fisher and Company, Inc., for the sum of $2,500.
“3. That the defendants, Thomas J. Fisher and Company, Inc., retain the additional sum of $2,500.
“4. That each of the parties shall pay its own costs.”

. Burke v. Thomas J. Fisher & Co., Inc., D.C.D.C.1953, 127 F.Supp. 1.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.