U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1955

Becce v. Dulles

Becce v. Dulles
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided July 7, 1955 · Bastian, Prettyman
226 F.2d 265 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Joseph J. Lyman, Washington, D, C., for appellants., Miss Catherine B. Kelly, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Mr. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and Mr. Lewis Carroll, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for ap-pellee.

Becce v. Dulles

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgments in these cases are reversed and the cases are remanded upon the authority of Soccodato v. Dulles.1

Reversed and remanded.

. 96 U.S.App.D.C. -, 226 F.2d 243 ' (D.C.Cir., 1955).

Dissenting Opinion

BASTIAN, Circuit Judge,

dissents for the reasons stated by him in De Marco v. Dulles, 96 U.S.App.D.C.-, 226 F.2d 265.

Concurring Opinion

PRETTYMAN,- Circuit Judge,

concurs in this result solely because of the ruling issued by the court in Soccodato v. Dulles.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.