U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1956

Max Tendler v. Nick Basiliko

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided March 29, 1956 · Miller, Washington, Danaher

231 F.2d 516; 97 U.S. App. D.C. 357; 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3422 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Max Tendler, Washington, D. C., appellant pro se., Mr. J. Zitomer, Washington, D. C., filed a brief for appellant., Mr. Harry L. Ryan, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Roger J. White-ford, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellees Basiliko.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Corporation v. Basiliko (D.C. Cir. 1958)
T.V.T. Corp. v. Basiliko (D.C. Cir. 1958)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal, in essence, represents an effort by appellant to obtain relief from the terms of agreements and stipulations which he made as a result of his in *517 volvement in an unfortunate real estate transaction. The questions presented were carefully considered at hearings held before three Judges of the District Court on successive motions of the parties. All concluded that appellant was not entitled to relief. We agree. The judgment appealed from will be

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.