U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1956

Harry Lester Zook v. Pauline E. Zook

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided May 10, 1956 · Edgerton, Bastian, Burger

233 F.2d 369; 98 U.S. App. D.C. 167; 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3160 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Joseph M. Bonuso, Washington, D. C., for appellant., Mr. John A. Ryan, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Kreuz v. Kreuz (D.C. 1976)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court granting maintenance *370 and support pendente lite in a suit for absolute divorce to which a counterclaim for maintenance and support was filed.

Such an award is within the discretion of the trial court unless there is a showing of abuse of discretion. There is no such showing in this case. The judgment of the District Court must be affirmed.

It is not necessary to pass upon appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.