U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1956

Columbia Typographical Union, No. 101 v. The Evening Star Newspaper Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided April 30, 1956 · Miller, Bazelon, Danaher

233 F.2d 697; 98 U.S. App. D.C. 206; 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4521 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Eugene Gressman, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant., Mr. William B. Jones, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. George E. Hamilton and George E. Hamilton, III, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Nos. 71-1559, 71-1712 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board (D.C. Cir. 1973)
National Labor Relations Board v. News Syndicate Company, Inc., and New York Mailers' Union No. 6, International Typographical Union, Afl-Cio (2d Cir. 1960)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Union imposed a fine of $40 on the foreman of the Evening Star’s composing room. The foreman paid the fine and the Star refunded it to him and then sued the Union to recover the amount so refunded on the ground that the fine had been imposed in violation of the contract between the Washington Publishers Association and the Union. The District Court granted summary judgment to the plaintiff and the Union appealed.

We affirm the action of the trial court on the basis of Judge McGarraghy’s opinion, filed September 3, 1955, 141 F.Supp. 374.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.