U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1957

Otto Straehler v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided June 13, 1957 · Edgerton, Fahy

246 F.2d 675; 100 U.S. App. D.C. 394; 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3611 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

George Eric Rosden, Washington, for appellant., Irwin A. Seibel, Atty., Dept, of e, with whom Mr. George B. Searls iss Marbeth A. Miller, Attys., Dept, tice, were on the brief, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision. The 2 that cite it most often are listed here.

Masami Sasaki v. Rogers (District Court, District of Columbia 1960)
Reissner v. Rogers (D.C. Cir. 1960)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

is an action under § 34(e) of the ? with the Enemy Act, 40 Stat. amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 34(e), to review the Attorney General’s partial disallowance of a debt claim asserted against property vested under the Act. The plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for the defendant. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.