U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1957

P. Sorensen Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided May 23, 1957 · Edgerton, Danaher, Bastían

246 F.2d 687; 100 U.S. App. D.C. 406; 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5258; 1957 Trade Cas. (CCH) 68,721 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. James W. Cassedy, Washington, D. C., for petitioner., Mr. James E. Corkey, Atty., Federal Trade Commission, with whom Messrs. Earl W. Kintner, Gen. Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, Robert B. Dawkins, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, and Miles J. Brown, Atty., Federal Trade Commission, were on the brief, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Mid-South Distributors and Cotton States, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (5th Cir. 1961)
Standard Motor Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (2d Cir. 1959)
American Motor Specialties Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (2d Cir. 1960)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order of the Federal Trade Commission is affirmed. Clayton Act, § 2(a), 38 Stat. 730, as amended by Robinson-Patman Act; 49 Stat. 1526, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13. Moog Industries, Inc., v. Federal Trade Commission, 8 Cir., 238 F.2d 43, certiorari granted on other grounds 353 U.S. 908, 77 S.Ct. 665, 1 L.Ed.2d 662; E. Edelman & Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 7 Cir., 239 F.2d 152; P. & D. Manufacturing Co., Inc., v. Federal Trade Commission, 7 Cir., 245 F.2d 281.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.