Clarence B. Dandridge v. United States
Opinion
Appellant urges that the District Court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw a plea of guilty to a charge of assault with a deadly weapon contemporaneous with dismissal of a charge of carrying a dangerous weapon.
A hearing was conducted in which the District Judge questioned appellant and his counsel on the circumstances surrounding the making of a plea of guilty before he denied the motion. We find no abuse of discretion.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Clarence B. DANDRIDGE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published