U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1957

Clarence B. Dandridge v. United States

Clarence B. Dandridge v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided November 12, 1957 · Edgerton, Prettyman, Burger
247 F.2d 105 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Clarence B. Dandridge v. United States

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant urges that the District Court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw a plea of guilty to a charge of assault with a deadly weapon contemporaneous with dismissal of a charge of carrying a dangerous weapon.

A hearing was conducted in which the District Judge questioned appellant and his counsel on the circumstances surrounding the making of a plea of guilty before he denied the motion. We find no abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

EDGERTON, Chief Judge, dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.