U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1957

Marshall v. Brucker

Marshall v. Brucker
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided April 26, 1957
243 F.2d 834; 100 U.S. App. D.C. 256 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Donald B. MacGuineas, Atty., Dept, of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. George C. Doub, Messrs. Paul A. Sweeney and Howard E. Shapiro, Attys., Dept, of Justice, were on the brief for appellee., Mr. Edward H. Hickey, Atty., Dept, of Justice, at the time record was filed, also entered an appearance for appellee.

Marshall v. Brucker

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We are agreed that Harmon v. Brucker, 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. -•, 243 F.2d 613, is controlling here. If the question were open, Judge Bazelon would reverse for the reasons stated in his dissent in Harmon and Judge Fahy would wish to consider the question anew.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.