U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1958

Morris Mac Schwebel v. Andrew D. Orrick, Harold C. Patterson, Earl F. Hastings, James C. Sargent

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided April 7, 1958 · Edgerton, Danaher, Burger

251 F.2d 919 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Chester T. Lane, New York City, for appellant. Mr. Alexander B. Hawes, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellant., Mr. David Ferber, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, with whom Mr. Thomas G. Meeker, Gen. Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, was on the brief, for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

14 later published cases cite this decision. The 13 that cite it most often are listed here.

Colley v. James (District Court, District of Columbia 2017)
M.B.E. Inc. v. Minority Business Opportunity Commission (D.C. 1984)
Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment (D.C. 1980)
Touche Ross & Co. v. Sec (2d Cir. 1979)
Touche Ross & Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission (2d Cir. 1979)
Daniel M. Koden v. United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service (7th Cir. 1977)
KODEN (Board of Immigration Appeals 1976)
Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. Campbell (Pa. 1975)
Murray A. Kivitz v. Securities and Exchange Commission (D.C. Cir. 1973)
Davis & Co. v. Cohen (2d Cir. 1966)
Fontaine v. Securities and Exchange Commission (District Court, D. Puerto Rico 1966)
M. G. Davis & Co. v. Cohen (2d Cir. 1966)
Capitol Packing Co. v. United States (10th Cir. 1965)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant asked the District Court to enjoin the Securities and Exchange Commission from conducting a hearing to determine whether appellant should be prevented from continuing to practice before the Commission. Though we think the District Court was right in dismissing the complaint, we think the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedy and the court therefore erred in ruling on the Commission’s authority to disbar attorneys. Camp v. Herzog, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 190 F.2d 605.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.