U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1958

Albert E. Blackshear v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided March 18, 1958 · Prettyman, Bazelon, Washington

252 F.2d 853 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Dayton M. Harrington, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. James D. Graham, Jr., Washington, D. C. (both appointed by this Court) was on the brief for appellant., Mr. Harold D. Rhynedance, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., for appellee. Mr. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Messrs. Arthur J. McLaughlin, and Lewis Carroll, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Frank Lewis (D.C. Cir. 1970)
Richard E. Leigh v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1964)
Howell v. United States (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1968)
George Williams, Jr. v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1962)
Clifton C. Johnson v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1961)
United States v. Arthur William Ladson (2d Cir. 1961)
James S. Gilliam v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1958)
James N. Washington v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1958)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*854 PER CURIAM.

Blackshear was convicted of robbery and assault with a deadly weapon. On appeal he argues that his arrest was illegal and that the decision of the Supreme Court in the Mallory case 1 precluded the admission of certain statements which he made.

Since he did not raise the point below, and since the circumstances do not call for an application of Rule 52(b), 18 U.S.C.A., we do not consider the alleged error. 2 Lawson v. United States, 1957, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 332, 248 F.2d 654. The judgment of the District Court is therefore

Affirmed.

. Mallory v. United States, 1957, 354 U.S. 449, 77 S.Ct. 1356, 1 L.Ed.2d 1479.

. The statements made were in the nature of an alibi. Conviction evidently rested on other evidence, chiefly that of the victim.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.