U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1958

Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, Intervenor

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided October 27, 1958 · Fahy, Washington, Danaher

257 F.2d 199 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Eliot C. Lovett, Washington, D. C., for appellant., Mr. John H. Conlin, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, with whom Messrs. Warren E. Baker, Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Edgar W. Holtz, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, and Richard A. Solomon, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, were on the brief, for appellee., Mr. Paul Dobin, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Leonard H. Marks, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for intervenor.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision. The 5 that cite it most often are listed here.

Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, Intervenor (D.C. Cir. 1963)
TV 9, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (D.C. Cir. 1973)
Consolidated Nine, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (D.C. Cir. 1968)
Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, Intervenor (D.C. Cir. 1965)
Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, Intervenor (D.C. Cir. 1959)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the Federal Communications Commission, granting television Channel 9 in Orlando, Florida, to intervenor Mid-Florida Television Corporation. Appellant, the unsuccessful applicant, challenges the Commission’s action. After reviewing appellant’s contentions, we find no basis for disturbing the Commission’s award. See Tampa Times Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 1956, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 256, 230 F.2d 224.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.