U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1958

Arthur M. Parker, Jr., and Tom K. Wheeler v. Louise O. Wellborn

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided November 20, 1958 · Miller, Bazelon, Burger

261 F.2d 767; 104 U.S. App. D.C. 301 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Charles H. Quimby, Washington, D. C., for appellants., Mr. Henry H. Paige, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Arthur P. Drury, John M. Lynham and John E. Powell, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Bank of New York v. Hoyt (District Court, D. Rhode Island 1985)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants sued to reform a contract under which they had given appellee a series of notes. She filed a counterclaim on those notes which had become due and was given judgment thereon, although the issues as to reformation had not been reached. The court expressly determined, however, in accordance with Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 1 there was no just reason for delay as to the counterclaim. This appeal is from the judgment awarded on the matured notes.

The claims of the appellants remain undetermined, and are not affected by the judgment on the counterclaim. We find no error.

Affirmed.

. 28 U.S.C.A.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.