Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1958

District of Columbia v. Karsunky

District of Columbia v. Karsunky
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided May 15, 1958 · No. 14209-14213
258 F.2d 430 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Leo J. Ehrig, Jr., Asst. Corp. Counsel for the District of Columbia, with whom Mr. Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, Mr. Milton D. Korman, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, and Mr. Henry E. Wixon, Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for petitioner., Mr. Walter N. Tobriner, Washington, D. C., for respondents.

District of Columbia v. Karsunky

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

These are petitions to review decisions of the District of Columbia Tax Court. Respondents, during the taxable years here involved, were engaged in the practice of engineering, either individually or as partners. The District of Columbia claimed a tax under the unincorporated business franchise tax provisions of the District of Columbia Code.1 The Tax Court entered decisions against the District of Columbia. In its opinion that court clearly, and we think correctly, stated and discussed the issues in the cases and reached the correct result. We see no need for further discussion here.

Affirmed.

. 61 Stat. 332 (1947), amended, 62 Stat. 206 (1948), D.C.Code, § 47-1554 (1951); 61 Stat. 345 (1947), D.C.Code, § 47-1574 (1951)

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.