Insurance Agents' International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision. The 14 that cite it most often are listed here.
- United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii) (D.C. Cir. 1979)
- United States v. Lawrence Daniel Caldwell, A/K/A Thomas E. Morgan, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Eros A. Timm, (Two Cases) (D.C. Cir. 1976)
- Of Course, Inc., (Formerly: The Isaac Hamburger & Sons Company), a Maryland Corporation in Dissolution v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (4th Cir. 1974)
- District of Columbia v. Mark Grimes (D.C. Cir. 1968)
- Chen v. Ming Dow Ho (District Court, District of Columbia 2005)
- Martin Rosendo-Ramirez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (7th Cir. 1994)
- Central Transport, Incorporated, Central Cartage, Company and Big John Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board (7th Cir. 1993)
- National Organization For Women v. Social Security Administration (D.C. Cir. 1984)
- National Organization for Women v. Social Security Administration of the Department of Health & Human Services (D.C. Cir. 1984)
- Balaji Doraiswamy v. Secretary of Labor. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. v. The Secretary of Labor (D.C. Cir. 1976)
- Jeannette Lenkin v. District of Columbia, Morris Pollin v. District of Columbia (D.C. Cir. 1972)
- De Rodulfa v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1972)
- National Labor Relations Board v. Insurance Agents' International Union (Supreme Court of the United States 1960)
- Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board (3d Cir. 1959)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
This case involves the same question of law as was presented in Textile Workers Union of America, C.I.O. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1955, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 35, 227 F.2d 409, certiorari granted 350 U.S. 1004, 76 S.Ct. 650, 100 L.Ed. 867, certiorari vacated 1956, 352 U.S. 864, 77 S.Ct. 90, 1 L.Ed.2d 73. Amicus attempts to distinguish this case from Textile Workers Union, but we find no critical difference between the two eases. On the authority of that case, the order of the Board here under review must be set aside. One panel of this court will not attempt to overrule a recent precedent set by another panel, even though one or more of its members may disagree with the ruling.
So ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.