U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1959

Joseph S. Gullo and Vivian B. Gullo v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Association

Joseph S. Gullo and Vivian B. Gullo v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Association
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided May 28, 1959 · Miller, Bazelon, Bastian
269 F.2d 517; 106 U.S. App. D.C. 70; 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3781 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Joseph S. Gullo, Arlington, Va., for appellants., Mr. Paul Daniel, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Carlyle C. Ring, Jr., Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass’n. Mr. James R. Worsley, Jr., Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellee Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass’n., Mr. Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corp. Counsel for the District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, and Milton D. Korman, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for appellee District of Columbia.

Joseph S. Gullo and Vivian B. Gullo v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Association

Cases that cite this one

38 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case was dismissed by the District Court apparently on the ground of res judicata, the court taking judicial notice of the previous case between the parties, the details of which are spelled out in Gullo v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Association, 1957, 101 U.S.App. D.C. 167, 247 F.2d 573.

In all its essential particulars, the present action is the same as that of the previous case, and the District Court correctly applied the doctrine of res judi-cata.

While the defense of laches was interposed, it is not necessary that we pass on that issue.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.