Manuel Baker v. Celia Radow
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment against him in appellee’s suit for damages resulting from an automobile collision. His primary point, that the court *752 erred in refusing to direct a verdict in his favor, rests on his contention that some of the testimony against him was inherently incredible. We find no error.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Manuel BAKER, Appellant, v. Celia RADOW, Appellee
- Status
- Published