U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1960

Manuel Baker v. Celia Radow

Manuel Baker v. Celia Radow
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided January 7, 1960 · Prettyman, Bazelon, Bastían
274 F.2d 751; 107 U.S. App. D.C. 93; 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5695 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Allan C. Swingle, Washington, D. C. , for appellant., Mr. Arthur S. Feld, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Joseph D. Bulman and Sidney M. Goldstein, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Manuel Baker v. Celia Radow

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment against him in appellee’s suit for damages resulting from an automobile collision. His primary point, that the court *752 erred in refusing to direct a verdict in his favor, rests on his contention that some of the testimony against him was inherently incredible. We find no error.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.