Ray M. Gidney, Comptroller of the Currency v. Commercial State Bank of Roseville, State Bank of Fraser
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Swomley v. Watt (District Court, District of Columbia 1981)
- Bank of Laurel v. Bloom (District Court, S.D. Mississippi 1977)
- New York Stock Exchange, Inc. v. Smith (District Court, District of Columbia 1975)
- Bank of Sussex County v. Saxon (District Court, D. New Jersey 1966)
- Walker Bank & Trust Co. v. Saxon (District Court, D. Utah 1964)
- State of South Dakota v. National Bank of South Dakota (District Court, D. South Dakota 1963)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Ray M. GIDNEY, Comptroller of the Currency, Appellant
v.
COMMERCIAL STATE BANK OF ROSEVILLE, State Bank of Fraser, Appellees.
No. 15435.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued March 25, 1960.
Decided May 12, 1960, Petition for Rehearing Denied June 3, 1960.
Mr. John G. Laughlin, Jr., Attorney, Department of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. George, C. Doub, Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Samuel D. Slade, Attorney, Department of Justice, were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U.S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellant.
Mr. N. Barr Miller, Washington, D.C., with whom , messrs. J. Marvin Haynes and Joseph H. Sheppard, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellees.
Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and BURGER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We agree in general with the opinion of Judge Youngdahl in the District Court. Commercial State Bank of Roseville v. Gidney, 174 F.Supp. 770. The appealed judgment is therefore
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.