U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1960

Interstate Broadcasting Co. v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided December 22, 1960

286 F.2d 544; 109 U.S. App. D.C. 260 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Messrs. Maurice M. Jansky and Carl H. Imlay, Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Mr. Philip G. Loucks, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for petitioner., Mr. Richard M. Zwolinski, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, with whom Messrs. John L. FitzGerald, Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Max D. Paglin, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, and Richard A. Solomon, Atty. Dept, of Justice, were on the brief, for respondents.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision. The 1 that cite it most often are listed here.

Interstate Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission (D.C. Cir. 1963)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

On the authority of Interstate Broadcasting Co. v. United States of America, and Federal Communications Comm., 109 U.S.App.D.C. --, 286 F.2d 539, the Commission’s order denying intervention is reversed and the Commission is directed to allow Interstate to intervene in its proceedings.

So ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.