U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1961

William H. T. Carney v. Thomas S. Gates, Jr., Secretary of Defense

William H. T. Carney v. Thomas S. Gates, Jr., Secretary of Defense
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided March 2, 1961 · Bazelon, Bagman, Burger
288 F.2d 161; 109 U.S. App. D.C. 377; 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5175 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. George C. Dreos, Washington, D. C., for appellant., Mr. David L. Rose, Atty., Dept, of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. George C. Doub, Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Morton Hollander, Atty., Dept, of Justice, were on the brief, for appellees. Mr. Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellees.

William H. T. Carney v. Thomas S. Gates, Jr., Secretary of Defense

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Challenging his removal from service as a non-veteran civilian employee of the Department of the Army, appellant sued for a declaratory judgment in the District Court. The appellees moved for summary judgment and, in the alternative, for judgment on the pleadings on grounds of laches. The court granted the motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. We affirm the dismissal on the ground that the suit is barred by laches. United States ex rel. Arant v. Lane, 1919, 249 U.S. 367, 39 S.Ct. 293, 63 L.Ed. 650; Drown v. Higley, 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 326, 244 F.2d 774; Wunderle v. Kimball, 1952, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 394, 201 F.2d 707.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.