U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1961

Buckley v. United States

Buckley v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided April 21, 1961
289 F.2d 458 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Buckley v. United States

Opinion

289 F.2d 458

110 U.S.App.D.C. 81

William H. BUCKLEY, t/a Tri-Counties Broadcasting Company, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, and Federal Communications
Commission, Respondents, National Broadcasting
Company, Inc., Intervenor.

No. 15501.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Dec. 5, 1960.
Decided March 30, 1961, Petition for Rehearing En Banc
Denied April 21, 1961.

Mr. Benedict P. Cottone, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Arthur Scheiner, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner.

Mr. Max D. Paglin, now Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, with whom Messrs. John L. FitzGerald, Gen. Counsel of the Federal Communications Commission at the time the brief was filed, Richard M. Zwolinski, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Richard A. Solomon and Henry Geller, Attys., Dept. of Justice, were on the brief, for respondents.

Mr. Denis G. McInerney, New York City, with whom Messrs. Eugene F. Sikorovsky and Howard Monderer, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for intervenor.

Before BAZELON, WASHINGTON and BURGER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The order of theCommission is affirmed. Harvey Radio Labs., Inc. v. F.C.C., 110 U.S.App.D.C. , 289 F.2d 458.

2

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.