U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1961

Cornell Joel Grossman, D.D.S. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission and United States of America

Cornell Joel Grossman, D.D.S. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission and United States of America
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided April 13, 1961 · Edgerton, Bazelon, Bastian
289 F.2d 464; 110 U.S. App. D.C. 87; 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4841 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Dr. Cornell Joel Grossman, petitioner pro se., Miss Kathryn H. Baldwin, Atty., Dept. of Justice, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. William H. Orrick, Jr., Messrs. Courts Oulahan, Deputy Gen. Counsel, United States Atomic Energy Commission, and Morton Hollander, Atty., Dept. of Justice, were on the brief, for respondents., Mr. Mark Joelson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, also entered an appearance for respondents.

Cornell Joel Grossman, D.D.S. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission and United States of America

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The questions involved in this case are practically identical with those we decided in Grossman v. United States, United States Atomic Energy Commission, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 246 F.2d 709, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 285, 78 S.Ct. 340, 2 L.Ed.2d 270, rehearing denied, 355 U. S. 942, 78 S.Ct. 427, 2 L.Ed.2d 422. The principle of res judicata requires affirmance of the order now before us.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.