Edward M. Stuart and the John E. Stuart Company v. Theodore C. Meeker, Doing Business as Tri-State Engineering & Service Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Edward M. Stuart and the John E. Stuart Company v. Theodore C. Meeker, Doing Business as Tri-State Engineering & Service Co., 289 F.2d 902 (D.C. Cir. 1961)
Miller, Edgerton, Prettymar

Edward M. Stuart and the John E. Stuart Company v. Theodore C. Meeker, Doing Business as Tri-State Engineering & Service Co.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The parties had been partners in an air conditioning business. Stuart sold his interest to Meeker and agreed that for two years he would not “interfere” with Meeker’s business, but would work for him as a part-time employee. Meeker sued Stuart for alleged violations of the dissolution agreement and was awarded damages and other relief. Stuart appeals.

We accept the trial court’s interpretation of the dissolution agreement, and are of the opinion that the evidence supported its decision.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Edward M. STUART and the John E. Stuart Company, Appellants, v. Theodore C. MEEKER, Doing Business as Tri-State Engineering & Service Co., Appellee
Cited By
15 cases
Status
Published