U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1961

Joseph De Luca v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury

Joseph De Luca v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided June 8, 1961 · Edgerton, Washington, Bastían
293 F.2d 852; 110 U.S. App. D.C. 375; 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4269 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Joseph DeLuca, appellant pro se., Mr. Arnold T. Aikens, Asst. U. S. Atty., for appellees. Mr. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., at the time the brief was filed, Mr. Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., at the time the brief was filed, and Miss Doris H. Spangenburg, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief for appellees. Messrs. David C. Acheson, now U. S. Atty., and Donald S. Smith, Asst. U. S. Atty., also entered appearances for appellees.

Joseph De Luca v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury

Cases that cite this one

26 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a civil service case, in which plaintiff-appellant seeks reinstatement to his former post in the Internal Revenue Service. We have considered the contentions advanced by appellant, but are satisfied he received all the procedural rights accorded him by statute and regulation. We find no error “cognizable within the scope of permissible review,” Hargett v. Summerfield, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 85, 88, 243 F.2d 29, 32, certiorari denied, 353 U.S. 970, 77 S.Ct. 1060, 1 L.Ed. 2d 1137 (1957). The order of the District Court, granting the Government’s motion for summary judgment, will accordingly be

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.