U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1962

Young Americans for Freedom, Inc. v. Dean Rusk, Individually and as Secretary of State

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided March 6, 1962 · Bazelon, Burger, Chambers, Per Curiam

303 F.2d 771; 113 U.S. App. D.C. 6; 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5761 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Thomas M. O’Malley, Washington, D. C., was on the motion for appellant., Messrs. David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., Nathan J. Paulson, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Gil Zimmerman, Special Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the motion for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Sam T. Cobb, Jr. v. Tracy C. Murrell, Regional Administration, Bureau of Employment Security, United States Department of Labor (5th Cir. 1967)
Braude v. Wirtz (9th Cir. 1965)
Braude v. Wirtz (9th Cir. 1965)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to reverse and remand and petition for immediate hearing, of appellee’s opposition and of appellee’s motion to affirm the judgment of the District Court, 205 F.Supp. 603, it is

ORDERED by the court that appellant’s motion to reverse and remand is denied.

It is FURTHER ORDERED by the court that appellee’s motion to affirm is granted and that the judgment of the District Court appealed from herein is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.