The Commonwealth Engineering Company of Ohio and Carl Berger v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
The Commonwealth Engineering Company of Ohio and Carl Berger v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents, 304 F.2d 630 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
113 U.S. App. D.C. 53; 133 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 618; 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4955
The Commonwealth Engineering Company of Ohio and Carl Berger v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents
Opinion
This appeal from the denial of a patent application is wholly without merit. The trial judge, in a de novo proceeding, patiently afforded appellants every opportunity to develop their case. But they failed to show that their frozen blood thawing process would produce the result claimed or be otherwise useful. Accordingly, we affirm on the opinion of the District Court. Commonwealth Engineering Co. v. Ladd, D. D.C., 199 F.Supp. 51.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The COMMONWEALTH ENGINEERING COMPANY OF OHIO and Carl Berger, Appellants, v. David L. LADD, Commissioner of Patents, Appellee
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published