U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1962

Culinary Workers & Bartenders Union Local 535 v. National Labor Relations Board

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided November 1, 1962

310 F.2d 853 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Lionel Richman, Los Angeles, Cal., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D-.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. James F. Carroll, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for petitioner., Mr. Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Illinois, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst.. Gen. Counsel, and James C. Paras, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Culinary Workers And Bartenders Union Local 535 v. National Labor Relations Board (D.C. Cir. 1962)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board found that the petitioner union had picketed a certain restaurant in violation of Section 8(b) (7) (C) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 73 Stat. 544, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b) (7) (C) (Supp. 1961). The sole issue before us is whether substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole supports the Board’s finding. We hold that the finding is thus supported. The Board’s order will accordingly be affirmed and enforced.

So ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.