U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1963

W. Reuen Fisher v. North Branch Products, Inc., a Michigan Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided February 6, 1963 · Washington, Burger, Wright

312 F.2d 880 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Robert G. Mentag, Detroit, Mich., with whom Mr. Albert W. Rinehart, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant., Mr. Albert A. Smith, Saginaw, Mich., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Michigan, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. J. Harold Kil-coyne, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Multiscan Technologies USA LLC (District Court, W.D. Washington 2024)
Kennedy v. Wright (District Court, C.D. Illinois 1988)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is a sequel to North Branch Products, Inc. v. Fisher, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 182, 284 F.2d 611 (1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 827, 81 S.Ct. 713, 5 L.Ed.2d 705 (1961). After our remand, the case came to trial in the District Court, and resulted in a judgment against Fisher, requiring him to assign certain patents to the plaintiff corporation. This appeal followed.

Appellant makes a number of contentions. Inter alia,, he urges that the District Court lacked jurisdiction. But this was decided against appellant in our earlier decision, cited above, and *881 will not be reopened now. He also attacks the findings of fact of the District Court as clearly erroneous. They do not appear so to us. Nor do the conclusions of law appear in error. The judgment of the District Court will accordingly be

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.