U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1963

Leo Sade v. National Surety Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided February 7, 1963 · Washington, Danaher, Burger

314 F.2d 286; 114 U.S. App. D.C. 281; 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6203 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Raymond W. Bergan, Washington, D. C., for appellants., Mr. Harry L. Ryan, Jr., Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision. The 8 that cite it most often are listed here.

Imperial Insurance, Incorporated, American Homeowners Insurance Company v. The Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, Limited (D.C. Cir. 1970)
Sutro Bros. & Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Company of North America (2d Cir. 1967)
Eglin National Bank v. Home Indemnity Co. (5th Cir. 1978)
Arnold D. Berkeley v. Home Insurance Company (D.C. Cir. 1995)
First Nat'l Bk. v. USF & G. CO. (Md. 1975)
First National Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (Md. 1975)
Hepler v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. (La. Ct. App. 1970)
Sutro Bros. & Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America (District Court, S.D. New York 1967)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*287 PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court dismissing appellants’ complaint and awarding costs to appellee, and from an order denying appellants’ motion for a new trial. The record discloses no error with reference to dismissal of the complaint and no abuse of discretion in denying the motion for a new trial. We therefore affirm on the basis of the opinion of the trial court filed April 17, 1962, and reported at 203 F. Supp. 680, and on its memorandum and order filed May 23,1962, denying the motion for a new trial.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.