U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1963

Margaret Fleming, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fleming v. Mufid K. Ayoub

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided February 14, 1963 · Fahy, Danaher, Wright

315 F.2d 47; 114 U.S. App. D.C. 301; 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6140 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Alvin L. Newmyer, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Edmund Eugene Fleming and Alvin L. Newmyer, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Armand Newmyer, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellant., Mr. John L. Laskey, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Thomas S. Jackson and Robert M. Gray, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Mains v. United States (District Court, S.D. Ohio 1974)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant, appellee, entered upon a jury verdict in his favor after trial of a personal injury action for damages, filed by appellant. The injuries were alleged to have been caused by the negligence of appellee in driving an automobile which collided with appellant, a pedestrian, at a street intersection.

An instruction on last clear chance was not given in the form requested by appellant, but no objection was made to the instructions as given.

Upon consideration of the evidence in relation to the instructions in their en *48 tirety, together with the absence of objection to the instructions as given, we find no error which requires us to disturb the judgment entered upon the verdict of the jury.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.