U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1963

George E. Burroughs v. United States of America, James R. Burroughs v. United States of America, Ellsworth Brooks v. United States

George E. Burroughs v. United States of America, James R. Burroughs v. United States of America, Ellsworth Brooks v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided March 7, 1963
316 F.2d 657 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

George E. Burroughs v. United States of America, James R. Burroughs v. United States of America, Ellsworth Brooks v. United States

Opinion

316 F.2d 657

George E. BURROUGHS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
James R. BURROUGHS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Ellsworth BROOKS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 17234.

No. 17306.

No. 17446.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued February 26, 1963.

Decided March 7, 1963.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, John J. Sirica, District Judge.

Mr. William B. Bryant, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. William C. Gardner and Theodore R. Newman, Jr., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. Robert A. Levetown, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., and Frank Q. Nebeker, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee. Miss Barbara A. Lindemann, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Messrs. Nathan J. Paulson and Luke C. Moore, Asst. U. S. Attys. at the time the record was filed, also entered appearances for appellee in No. 17234.

Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

These appeals are from convictions of robbery. D.C.Code § 22-2901. Testimony identifying the appellants as the robbers was properly submitted to the jury. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

2

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.